Open Access and Free to Publish in Asian Journal of Health Sciences

Letter to Editor Open Access Logo

Prevalence rate of intimate partner violence by WHO region: an appraisal by current data

Ensiyeh Jenabi 1, *
Salman Khazaei 2
  1. Pediatric Developmental Disorders Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  2. 1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Correspondence to: Ensiyeh Jenabi, Pediatric Developmental Disorders Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. Email: en.jenabi@yahoo.com.
Published: 2018-11-18

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • HTML Views: 4560
  • PDF Views: 696
  • XML Views: 5

Statistics from Dimensions

Copyright The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access by BioMedPress. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern that annually affects 1 in 3 (35%) of women worldwide. The term “intimate partner violence” defines as physical, sexual, or psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse.

Women with the characteristics like: low level of education, history of abuse among parents, history of childhood, abuse, antisocial personality disorder, attitudes accepting violence and male privilege are more susceptible to IPV. Consequence of this violence, victims may experience some serious short- and long-term physical, mental, sexual and reproductive health problems such as injuries, chronic pain, gastrointestinal, and gynecological problems including sexually-transmitted diseases, depression, homicide or suicide, and post-traumatic stress disorders.

Dear Editor in Chief

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern that annually affects 1 in 3 (35%) of women worldwide. The term “intimate partner violence” defines as physical, sexual, or psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse 1.

Women with the characteristics like: low level of education, history of abuse among parents, history of childhood, abuse, antisocial personality disorder, attitudes accepting violence and male privilege are more susceptible to IPV 2. Consequence of this violence, victims may experience some serious short- and long-term physical, mental, sexual and reproductive health problems such as injuries, chronic pain, gastrointestinal, and gynecological problems including sexually-transmitted diseases, depression, homicide or suicide, and post-traumatic stress disorders 3.

Figure 1

Prevalence rate of intimate partner violence by WHO region in 2010.

According to CDC’s National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), nearly 25% of adult females and 15% of adult males have experienced severe physical violence from an intimate partner in their lifetime. This survey showed that the prevalence of sexual contact violence among females and males were 16% and 7% respectively 4. Prevalence rate of IPV by WHO region in 2010 are presented in Figure 1, as shown the wide variability in levels of violence within and among regions the higher prevalence belong to south East Asia and east Mediterranean regions with 37.7% and 37% respectively, the rate of IPV in high income countries was much lower (23.2%) 5. Evidence shows that advocacy and counseling interventions in high-income countries has improved access to services for survivors of IPV and subsequently reducing such violence 6. It should be noted because of stigmatized and blamed due to received abuse in women; these statistics are prone to underestimation.

Based on the above, it is understood that risk of violence is greatest in low resource settings where the use of violence in many situations is a socially-accepted norm. Preventive strategies in these societies should focus on improving the status of women economically and socially as well as reducing norms of violence, poverty, and alcohol consumption 7.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing intimate partner violence 2017. 2017; :
  2. World-Health-Organization. Violence against women: Key facts 2017. 2017; :
  3. J. C. Campbell. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002; 359: 1331-6.
  4. Sharon G Smith, Kathleen C Basile, Leah K Gilbert, Melissa T Merrick, Nimesh Patel, Margie Walling, Anurag Jain. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010-2012 state report. 2017; :
  5. C. Garcia-Moreno, C. Pallitto, K. Devries, H. Stockl, C. Watts, N. Abrahams. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. 2013; :
  6. Seema Vyas, Charlotte Watts. How does economic empowerment affect women\'s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association 2009; 21: 577-602.
  7. R. Jewkes. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet 2002; 359: 1423-9.

Comments