Introduction

In Pakistan's population, coronary vascular diseases become the premier risk; due to this disease, 30- 40% of all deaths occur in Pakistan. Every year the death caused by cardiac disease is extended to 200,000 per year1, 2. Annually, more than 7.6 million patients were admitted to Emergency Departments in the U.S., with chest pain's main complaint3. It was reported that 31% of all deaths occur due to cardiovascular disease, with 80% happening in low- and middle-income countries4. In the Emergency Department, the accurate and timely triage level designation plays a key role in lessening death and disease. Still, facts show that accuracy rates are low, which delays the care process of a patient. In the American Heart Association (AHA) national guidelines, it is mentioned that health care providers need to fulfill cardiac emergency care goals from point of entry in emergency department to 90 minutes5. In acute myocardial infarction, electrocardiograms obtain, and doctors are evaluated within 10 minutes, and start thrombolytic medications within a half hour (labeled as door-to-needle or fibrinolysis) or provide percutaneous coronary intervention (labeled as door-to-balloon) within one and half hour6. To restore blood flow in the heart, rapid assessment and treatment are vital for the heart to preserve cardiac function. First of all, the nursing triage is done in the emergency department, which directly affects initial interventions and care as their skills to identify the Acute Myocardial Infarction play a vital role in taking rapid action. After the first occlusion, the Cardiac cell death can happen within twenty minutes or up to two hours7, 8.

The struggle to handle most patients coming for healthcare is done by the Management of Emergency, physician, and R.N.s9. The Emergency Triage Nurse's main role is to define the severity of disease and urgency of care required, such as in cardiac emergency patients, who require rapid care in triage. However, triage requires certain diagnostic tests to aid decisions. The subjective decision of triage level designation depends upon the collected data, observations, brief assessment of nursing, medical history, patient symptoms, and occasionally family history10, 11. In Pakistan, no proper triage system is developed, and no time limits and guidelines are defined for the completion of the triage process. The patient's assessment and a triage level designation is the triage goal representing symptoms urgency12. The Emergency Department can use ESI tool for accurate triage level to aid early interventions and affect patient outcomes. In Pakistan, the Triage system was introduced a few years ago in some hospitals. The triage process's standard guidelines are not available in Pakistan however, few hospitals in Pakistan have implemented a three or five-level triage system13, 14. This study will conclude the effectiveness of five-level ESI in a patient with acute myocardial infarction patient in the Emergency Department.

Methodology

Results

There were 12 nurses recognized among 70 nurses working in the emergency department by following the inclusion criteria of the study. Only 8 R.N. were given consent to participate, contributed to a 67% response rate, consisting of 2 females and 6 males, as shown in Figure 1. The age range was 24 – 33 years of nurses with a mean age was 28.11 years (SD = ± 2.31), and experience as R.N. was 2-7 years with mean 4.77 years (SD = ± 1.20) in the Emergency department (Table 1). Most of the nurses had diplomas (75%), while the remaining 25% hold a bachelor's degree in nursing. Total 224 patients were detected with an age range of 22 - 74 years, which constitute 59% male and 41% female (Table 2, Table 3).

Among all patients, 46 (20.5%) patients were smokers, 88 (39.3%) were diabetic and 100 (44.6 %) were reported about their cardiac disease history. 166 patients (78.5%) stated clearly about chest pain at triage, along with their other symptoms (Table 4).

The triage level 2 should have been designated to a cardiac patient who has severe chest pain and suspicion of acute myocardial infarction. With 180 frequency of patients, 80.35% overall accuracy rate of triage is recorded.

The Delay care was demarcated as the number of minutes a patient waited to be triaged by R.N., number of minutes a patient waited to have an ECG performed, number of minutes' a patient waited to be seen by an E.R. physician, and the number of minutes a patient waited to seen by a cardiologist. Those time points are identified in Table 6. It is noteworthy that the meantime to triage was recorded 6.75 minutes, the meantime to ECG was 7.30 minutes, the meantime to E.R. physician assessment was 11 minutes, and the meantime to cardiology physician checkup was 25.19 minutes. The recorded time in the current study is significantly inside the recommended guidelines of AHA for cardiac patients.

Discussion

In this study, a total 224 patients were included, 166 (78.5%) of acute myocardial infarction had got triage level 2 designation, which was appropriate. This triage level designation is important in defining how rapidly the patient gets an ECG and is assessed by a healthcare physician. Thus, an accuracy rate of 80% was acceptable but still concerning in terms of patient life. The priority nurse probably had trouble defining the symptoms which characterized ACS. According to Previous studies, the triage accuracy rate was 50% to 76%15, 16, 17.

This study contains several limitations as it does not explore all the factors, cause and effect of relationship and association among variables which affect the triage decision. Yet, this variation in nurse triage decisions might be due to other circumstance which was not explored, such as priority nurse critical thinking skills, E.D. infrastructure, and decision-making functions.In this study, variables were recognized that might describe accuracy in triage level designations. The patient and R.N. variables were recognized as significant in determining the accuracy of triage designation.

In this study, patients' pictorial description of pain for R.N.s was renowned as an important decision point. Though the accuracy rate was only 80%, a significant relationship was observed between accuracy and chest pain patient reports. Those patients reporting chest pain were more expected to be triaged accurately. It was expected that more patients would present with atypical symptoms and not report chest pain, but only (N = 48) 21.5% reported no chest pain along with other symptoms such as shortness of breath, syncope, palpitations, apprehension, and diaphoresis. In this study, 78.5% reported chest pain in the initial triage documentation. It might be due to the priority nurse question about chest pain; they might give a positive response by considering it a true emergency. As cardiac ischemia main symptom was Chest pain. Therefore, these patients were triaged accurately, which was 80%, and got a level 2 designation, resulting in better triage accuracy in chest pain patients. According to previous reports, the BSN education level has been identified as positively affecting general patient results because the nursing purpose is triage-level designation decisions, which might lead to bad patient consequences18, 12. BSN rather than R.N triaged almost 50% of the patients.

The overall delay occurs in the Emergency Department for acute myocardial infarction patients. However, rapid identification is vital for the initiation of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction19, 20. The cardiac patient waited, proceeding by priority to initiate the triage assessment, a mean of 6.75 minutes (range 0-13 minutes). Many studies have recognized overall E.D. wait times that are prolonged and fall outside the ESI level recommendations for the right care and better results. In previous studies, the mean delay triage time recorded was 27 min, 26 min, and 14 min, regardless of the severity of chief complaint21, 22, 17. In the current study, 6.75 min triage meantime, 7.30 min ECG meantime, 11 min E.R. physician assessment meantime, and 25.19 min cardiology resident assessment meantime was recorded. It might be due to better emergency department infrastructure, due to good clinical knowledge and experience of priority nurse and the quality implementation of triage system by E.D. management to get a better outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Conclusion

In this study, the triage level designation accuracy rate and delay care in acute myocardial infarction patients were identified. Triage level designation, ECG delay, E.R. physician assessment delay, and cardiology resident assessment delay were insignificant. Still, triage designation was not accurate in 20% of the patient might lead to a bad outcome in these cardiac patients. Patients who reported chest pain were predictive of better accuracy and did not delay ECG, E.R. physician assessment, and cardiology resident assessment. In patients with acute myocardial infarction symptoms, delays in triage level designation may result in a significant delay in emergent cardiac care.

Similarly, delay in ECG led to a prolonged delay in emergent cardiac care. On the other hand, E.R. physician assessment delays lead to a delay in emergency care. Similarly, the cardiology resident delay assessment delayed getting re-perfusion therapy by acute myocardial infarction, which leads to bad outcomes. This study contains several limitations as it does not explore all the factors, cause and effect of relationship and association among variables which affect the triage decision. Yet, this variation in nurse triage decisions might be due to other circumstance which was not explored, such as priority nurse critical thinking skills, E.D. infrastructure, and decision-making functions. So, it is recommended to evaluate other factors affecting triage level designations decisions and determine the relationship among variables.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.